Skip to content

Deeper down the rabbit hole…..

February 9, 2010

This is a comment made by Dr Andrew Lacis of NASA/GISS,  in the IPCC 4th Assessment Report:

“There is no scientific merit to be found in the Executive Summary. The presentation sounds like something put together by Greenpeace activists and their legal department. The points being made are made arbitrarily with legal sounding caveats without having established any foundation or basis in fact. The Executive Summary seems to be a political statement that is only designed to annoy greenhouse skeptics. Wasn’t the IPCC Assessment Report intended to be a scientific document that would merit solid backing from the climate science community – instead of forcing many climate scientists into having to agree with greenhouse skeptic criticisms that this is indeed a report with a clear and obvious political agenda. Attribution can not happen until understanding has been clearly demonstrated. Once the facts of climate change have been established and understood, attribution will become self-evident to all. The Executive Summary as it stands is beyond redemption and should simply be deleted.”

And people wonder why we are becoming sceptical about the IPCC, Jim Hansen, and other “notable” climate scientists.  No politicised agenda?

Totally true and you can see it for yourself right here.

http://pds.lib.harvard.edu/pds/view/7798293?n=17

Advertisements
One Comment
  1. Thank you again.
    Dr Andrew Lacis was obviously right 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: